When R-G 2005 applicants were asked to rate the “announcement” process for the research grants 2005, 45.5% thought it was very proper, 27.3 % rated it as proper, 15 % were indifferent and 12.2% thought it was improper.
When R-G 2005 applicants were asked to rate the reviewing process of their researches, 81.2 % agreed about their confidence regarding it, 9.4 % were in different and 9.4% were unconfident about it.
When R-G 2005 applicants were asked to rate their interest in applying to R-G 2006, 76% were interested, 8% were indifferent and 16% were not interested.
When R-G 2005 applicants were asked to rate their interest in recommending BA/CSSP research grants program to their friends, 94% agreed they would recommend it, while 6% were not going to recommend it.
The chart demonstrates:
Number of speakers in BVA04 = 73 vs. number of speakers in BVA06 = 120
Number of online registered participants in BVA04 = 1511 participants vs. number of online registered participants in BVA06 = 1878
It is worth to mention that BVA04 registration was sponsored by BA Board of Trustees –free registration- while BVA06 registration was paid by the participants
Participants responses to the value of money for their conference registration fees: Their responses varied according to the fees they paid [fees changed with the time of registration, early bird registered paid lower than on site registration .. etc]
92% of BVA06 attendees agreed they want to attend BVA08
