Text Box:

Nakhla, Rafik

Rafik Nakhla a graduate pharmacist in 1982. He has received the following postgraduate qualifications:

Postgraduate Diploma in Quality Management, 1998, University of Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.

MA in Quality Management 2001, dissertation entitled: “Business Excellence” Model in the Egyptian Private Business Context.

Following five years of training and sales experience within the pharmaceutical industry he became, in 1991, an Instructor with the Business Studies Division of the Center for Adult and Continuing Education at the AUC designing and conducting the following courses: Salesmanship, Marketing and distribution, Consumer behavior, Selling function, Marketing research, Strategic marketing and E-marketing.

He is also teaching with the undergraduate program at the Arab Academy for Science Technology and Maritime Transportation.

Presently, he is also the Human Resource and Training Consultant to the Library of Alexandria and holds the position of Personnel Director.

 

BIOLOGY CURRICULUM IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN EGYPT

The 20th century has been called the century of Biology. It has been marked by two major events; 50 years ago Watson and Crick discovered the structure of DNA for which they earned the Nobel Prize. This discovery of the double Helix structure of nucleic acid although predicted by some other scientists opened the door for a total new science of biology and the road to more and more discovery that helped humanity understand better life 47 years later the human genome sequence was revealed.

The question that raises itself now having seen this revolution of biology and emergence of new life sciences do we prepare our students to meet the challenges of this science?

This paper analyzes, critically, the curriculum content of Biology in the secondary education in Egypt, and compares it with other curricula as the American and the British.

The Egyptian education system includes three stages covering so far 11 years, five primary, three preparatory and three secondary.

The secondary stage focus of this paper is divided into two stages the first year that is general studies than two years of specialization that have a cumulative result that affect the chances of University choice of studies.

The Egyptian learning system has been highly affected by the economic conditions of the country. Low resources have had their fingerprints on the school system resulting in low investment per capita in buildings faced by an ever-increased demand for education created by a population that grows at a rate of 2.2% per year. The net result is an increased capacity of classrooms that reach sometime 80 pupils per class. Such education system failed to develop technology to the point that Egypt is still a consumer only of technology. 

Marsh (1992) defined a curriculum framework as group of related subjects that fit together according to a predetermined set of criteria to appropriately cover an area of study. Print (1993) brings in a series of fundamental questions: What to teach? How to teach? When to teach? What is the impact of teaching? He also lists important criteria for content selection: Significance, Validity, Relevance, Utility, Learnability and Interest.

The Egyptian education system has been in a state of flux with a lot of changes one of these changes have affected the secondary education in an attempt to reduce exam-based stress a decision was taken to have a cumulative total for the last two years reducing the number of matters per year on one hand and consolidating two years curricula in one the result is zero gain as the same load still apply the same amount of information but concentrated in fewer subject matter.

The overall observation is that it is Academic rationalist conception with Subject centered design however it is not learnable to the point of being confusing in the second part, it does not follow a logical build up and it does not respond to the new life science, objectives are not clear. In the school book this unit covers 326 pages out of a total of 504 almost 65% of the syllabus is spent on this combination and only 22% is covering the new science of biology leaving 13% for changes in living organisms. It is still oriented to old biology, taxonomy more than cell and molecular biology the building blocks of this whole science.