next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |review
In 1998, Medicare said for the first time that they were going to cover screening for colorectal cancer and would pay for FOBT annually and for flex sig every four years. They defined some higher risk groups for which they’d do colonoscopy every two years. Incidentally, they really went ahead of the curve, because some of the groups they’ve identified as high-risk, such as those with a family history of adenoma, are still being debated. Regardless, they set the benchmark. Then, there were very few screenings done. The public wasn’t catalyzed to go get screening. Additionally, if you went for a screening flex sig under Medicare and found a polyp, which you have a 25% chance to find, then that procedure was coded not as a screening flex sig, but as a diagnostic flex sig. That meant there was no way for Medicare to track how many procedures were really screening and how many were diagnostic. With the new data coming through about colonoscopy and older people having a higher risk of proximal cancer, Medicare announced they would cover colonoscopy once every ten years. This was as of July 1, 2001. That means that everyone who’s over 65 on Medicare is now eligible to have a standard colonoscopy. I think there’s no going back from that. I don’t mean to criticize it; I think it’s a great achievement. But what really still comes to play is what to do in the 50-64 year old age group. Insurers are not jumping on the bandwagon to pay for colonoscopy in this group. Remember the risk is a little lower as you’re younger, you don’t have maybe the same proximal risk, and if you start taking all 50 to 64 year olds you’re going to spend a lot and the costs are extremely high.
next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |review