prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |36 |37 |38 |39 |40 |41 |review
The Occupational Disease Commission was faced with a daunting task. There were no  precedents for an industry-wide survey, the Commission was authorized to complete its surveys within one year, identification of industries operating in the State were inadequate or non-existent. To deal with the situation, the Commission limited the scope of the survey, divided the work by hazardous substance identity, and appointed a “managing director”, Alice Hamilton. Her competence, energy, and charm must have been key to her colleagues willingness to accede to her leadership. She described the situation as follows: