prev next front |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10 |11 |12 |13 |14 |15 |16 |17 |18 |19 |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |25 |26 |27 |28 |29 |30 |31 |32 |33 |34 |35 |36 |37 |38 |39 |40 |41 |42 |43 |44 |45 |review
However, I believe the focus is on platform neutral open source communication processes (I just love this idea! Man, I feel like breaking into a jig and sing "Imagine" as I type this!...:)...you're radical) in science. There is nevertheless a role of peer review in the process of establishment of scientific knowledge (if not for anything else, for the sake of QC). A minor point though, you might want to look at. Rather than focusing on "PowerPoint" as the idiom of the medium, why don't we set up something on our own as a presentation software (I know I sound like one going for reinventing the wheel, but this wheel's a little different -- from the standpoint of principle)? Or maybe, we borrow, for instance, something that is linux compatible, since linux is also another robust.

Arindam Basu is author of «How to Conduct a Meta-Analysis» Supercourse’s lecture.